State of California/California
WANTED TO LEASE BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - Cerritos
WANTED TO LEASE BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - Cerritos
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis
847
live signals
847
ready now
39
early RFIs
0
prime openings
Preview mode
Browse the live feed for free. Pro unlocks alerts, full summaries, and saved searches.
State of California/California
WANTED TO LEASE BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - Cerritos
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis
State of California/California
WANTED TO LEASE BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - Long Beach
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis
Internal Services Department/Los Angeles County
26-00869 - TRAFFIC CONTROL
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis
Internal Services Department/Los Angeles County
REDGATE FLYAWAY MULTIPLE SOFTWARE RENEWAL - BRAND SPECIFIC
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis
LA County Development Authority/Los Angeles County
NOTICE INVITATION FOR BIDS FOR FENCING SERVICES RFP NO. LACDA26-058 Notice is hereby given that proposals will be received by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) until Monday, June 22, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. for fencing services. This will include furnishing all labor, material and equipment, and performing all work necessary and incidental in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW) and contract documents. A Invitation for Bids (IFB) package containing all submission requirements may be downloaded from the LACDA’s Procurement System website at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/lacda. The LACDA intends to award one-year contract with the option of up to four (4) one-year extensions, provided services are satisfactory and funds are available. In submitting a proposal, each Proposer thereby agrees that, if awarded a contract, it shall execute a standard LACDA contract, a sample of which is attached to the RFP package for reference. The LACDA shall not award a contract to, or be obligated to execute a contract with, any Proposer who refuses to execute said standard LACDA contract. The LACDA reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. This RFP is not a contract or commitment of any kind. The LACDA is not liable for costs incurred in the preparation of the respondent’s proposal. LACDA reserves the right to issue supplementary information or guidelines related to this RFP. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, the LACDA reserves the right in its sole discretion to waive minor technical deficiencies in the Proposals. In accordance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, it is the policy of the LACDA to assure equal opportunity to all persons, in the award and performance of any contract, without regard to race, color, sex, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, or disability. CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS Insurances (Please refer to the Sample LACDA Contract for required values and additional requirements.) - General Liability Insurance with additional Insured Endorsement. Shall include Completed Operations and be on a primary and non-contributory basis and shall include waiver of subrogation. - Automobile Liability Insurance, coverage shall include owned, hired, non-owned, OR any auto. - Workers’ Compensation Liability Insurance shall be Statutory and include Employer’s Liability, and a waiver of subrogation. C-13 Fencing and C-23 Ornamental Metal Contractor License's issued by California Contractors State License Board Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration Child Support Compliance County Lobbyist Ordinance Default Property Tax Program Davis Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Act Fair Chance Employment Hiring Practices Policy Federal Lobbyist Requirements Federal Labor Standard Provisions Section 3 Provisions Jury Service Program Levine Act Safely Surrendered Baby Law State and Federal Prevailing Wages Zero Tolerance Human Trafficking Policy
State of California/California
59A1415 - Structure Construction Services
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis
Value
Not listed
Unlock analysis